This woman cares more about a Polar Bear in Alaska than she does you.
Chances are in the next presidential election this woman is going to ask you to vote for her for president of the United States.
Before you do remember one thing -- she has more regard for the polar bears, carribou and elk in Alaska than she has for you.
If the current energy bill pases the House as is expected, Senator Hillary Clinton will lead a group of Senate Democrats in an effort to defeat this bill at all costs. And their underlying, stated reason is the effect it will have on the wild life in the future -- along with the fact that it will not help future generations in America.
Now tell me, which is more important to you...
The Alaskan wild life or the price gouged cost of a gallon of gas?
The economy of future generations or being able to purchase price-gouged prescription medications you have to take to live and price gouged food, brought on by the inflated oil prices?
I am all for providing for the future -- but not at the cost of scuttling the present
I think polar bears are cute -- but not at the cost of bankruptcy
Folks, it is time for a reality check
If the Democratic Party is the party of the people, then I must be an alien.
So in about three and a half years -- when Queen Hillary asks you to vote for her
Remember -- in her eyesight you are lower than wildlife
Then vote accordingly
It is pretty dumb to think ANWR is going to change the price of gas in our livetimes. It won't come on-line years.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing that will really help us is switching cars. Period.
... It really amazes me that other Republicans (and I am one) don't get that basic market decision, and instead cry out for government solutions, pork-barrel spending, and mommy-government.
If you want to cut your fuel bill over the next few years, choose a more efficient car. You could do it today, if you really wanted to.
Or be a psuedo-liberal, waiting on your fat ass for the govenemrnt to bail you out!